> initializing desktop shell...
> preparing fullscreen session... [OK]
> ams access ready _
The room
A controlled desktop environment gives the round a boundary before the first response is written.
Controlled evaluation software
Serious evaluationsneed a roomof their own.
Controlled environments for written evaluations where the work, the session, and the review record all matter.
Controlled Round
Session Context
The environment, the work, and the record in one place
Windows
desktop installer
macOS
desktop package
Linux
desktop build
Worldview
Submissions are not enough.
A serious evaluation is more than an answer file. It is the environment the candidate worked inside, the interruptions around the work, and the evidence a reviewer can trust later.
AMS Access exists because high-trust rounds deserve review context, not just a final submission.
Give the round a boundary.
Not an LMS. Not a contest portal. Not a form with stricter language. A product surface for evaluations where process matters.
Evidence captured
The record
Session context is captured quietly, beside the work, so review starts from evidence instead of guesswork.
Timeline
The review
Written output and event history stay together, giving reviewers the shape of the session as it happened.
Controlled environment
Put the evaluation inside a product with edges.
A serious round should not depend on a browser tab, a meeting link, and a policy document. AMS Access gives the session a clear operating surface.
ams.session.config
{
"desktopSession": true,
"fullscreenMode": "controlled",
"evidence": {
"timeline": true,
"reviewReady": true
},
"downloadable": true
}
Review context
A submission is evidence. A session is context.
Answers matter, but so does the path around them. Timelines make the review legible without turning judgment into automation.
session-timeline.log
Review
- fullscreen_exit at 10:24:18
- tab_hidden at 10:24:20
- paste at 10:31:04
- focus_blur at 10:36:51
+ answer_autosaved at 10:24:28
+ fullscreen_enter at 10:24:33
+ final_answer_saved at 10:47:10
+ submitted at 10:58:44
Human judgment
Keep reviewers close to the work.
AMS Access packages written responses, status, timestamps, and activity history so reviewers can decide with confidence and restraint.
Review packet
Written response
Activity timeline
Session status
Reviewer note
Submit time
Reviewer workflow
Ready4
Needs review5
In review6
Cleared7
Pricing
For rounds with consequence.
Plans follow the shape of the evaluation: pilot, event, institution, or custom deployment.
Starter
For pilots and small high-trust rounds.
Controlled sessions, basic review context, versioned releases.
Event
For hiring, olympiad, and scholarship windows.
Higher volume, reviewer workflows, export support.
Institution
For recurring evaluations across teams or programs.
Multiple admins, centralized review, operational reporting.
Enterprise
For custom deployment and procurement needs.
Custom limits, support paths, and deployment planning.
Download
Put the environment in their hands.
Versioned builds for Windows, macOS, and Linux make deployment legible for technical teams.
Configure a RoundWindows
Installer package
Version notes and checksum-ready release flow.
macOS
Desktop package
Release path prepared for managed deployments.
Linux
Desktop build
Artifacts designed for technical operators.
Includes release notes, deployment context, and documentation paths for review operations.
Release Notes
Change should be visible.
Operational teams need to know what changed before the next round begins.
View ChangelogDesktop releases
Installers are organized by platform with version notes and release context.
Session shell
Fullscreen session state remains visible while activity evidence is recorded for review.
Reviewer evidence
Written output and activity timelines stay paired inside the review surface.
Release notes
Changelog entries keep operational teams aligned on app behavior and deployment updates.